191.
A microscope is focussed on a mark on a piece of paper and then a slab of glass of thickness $$3\,cm$$ and refractive index 1.5 is placed over the mark. How should the microscope be moved to get the mark in focus again ?
Apparent depth of mark as seen through a glass slab of thickness $$x$$ and refractive index $$\mu $$ is
Apparent depth $$ = \frac{{{\text{real depth}}}}{{{\text{refractive index}}}}$$
$${\text{or}}\,\,x' = \frac{x}{\mu } = \frac{3}{{1.5}} = 2\,cm$$
As image appears to be raised by $$1\,cm,$$ therefore, microscope must be moved upward by $$1\,cm.$$
192.
A luminous object and a screen are at a fixed distance $$D$$ apart. A converging lens of focal length $$f$$ is placed between the object and screen. A real image of the object in formed on the screen for two lens positions of they are separated by a distance $$d$$ equal to
Let the object distance be $$x.$$ Then, the image distance is $$D - x.$$
From lens equation, $$\frac{1}{x} + \frac{1}{{D - x}} = \frac{1}{f}$$
On algebraic rearrangement, we get
$$x2 - Dx + Df = 0$$
On solving for $$x,$$ we get
$$\eqalign{
& {x_1} = \frac{{D - \sqrt {D\left( {D - 4f} \right)} }}{2} \cr
& {x_2} = \frac{{D + \sqrt {D\left( {D - 4f} \right)} }}{2} \cr} $$
The distance between the two object positions is
$$d = {x_2} - {x_1} = \sqrt {D\left( {D - 4f} \right)} $$
193.
An observer can see through a pin - hole the top end of a thin rod of height h, placed as shown in the figure. The beaker height is $$3\,h$$ and its radius $$h.$$ When the beaker is filled with a liquid up to a height $$2\,h,$$ he can see the lower end of the rod. Then the refractive index of the liquid is
Frequency remains constant during refraction
$$\eqalign{
& {v_{med}} = \frac{1}{{\sqrt {{\mu _0}{ \in _0} \times \,4} }} = \frac{c}{2} \cr
& \frac{{{\lambda _{med}}}}{{{\lambda _{air}}}} = \frac{{{v_{med}}}}{{{v_{air}}}} = \frac{{\frac{c}{2}}}{c} = \frac{1}{2} \cr} $$
∴ wavelength is halved and frequency remains unchanged
195.
The given lens is broken into four parts and rearranged as shown. If the initial focal length is $$f$$ then after rearrangement the equivalent focal length is -
Cutting a lens in transverse direction doubles their focal length i.e. $$2f.$$
Using the formula of equivalent focal length,
$$\frac{1}{f} = \frac{1}{{{f_1}}} + \frac{1}{{{f_2}}} + \frac{1}{{{f_3}}} + \frac{1}{{{f_4}}}$$
We get equivalent focal length as $$\frac{f}{2}.$$
196.
A beam of light composed of red and green rays is incident obliquely at a point on the face of a rectangular glass slab. When coming out on the opposite parallel face, the red and green rays emerge from
A
two points propagating in two different non-parallel directions
B
two points propagating in two different parallel directions
C
one point propagating in two different directions
D
one point propagating in the same direction
Answer :
two points propagating in two different parallel directions
In any medium other than air or vacuum, the velocities of different colours are different. Therefore, both red and green colours are refracted at different angles of refraction. Hence, after emerging from glass slab through opposite parallel face, they appear at two different points and move in the two different parallel directions.
197.
If $${f_V}$$ and $${f_R}$$ are the focal lengths of a convex lens for violet and red light respectively and $${F_V}$$ and $${F_R}$$ are the focal lengths of concave lens for violet and red light respectively, then we have
A
$${f_V} < {f_R}\,\,{\text{and}}\,\,{F_V} > {F_R}$$
B
$${f_V} < {f_R}\,\,{\text{and}}\,\,{F_V} < {F_R}$$
C
$${f_V} > {f_R}\,\,{\text{and}}\,\,{F_V} > {F_R}$$
D
$${f_V} > {f_R}\,\,{\text{and}}\,\,{F_V} < {F_R}$$
According to Cauchy relation,
$$\eqalign{
& \mu = A + \frac{B}{{{\lambda ^2}}} + \frac{C}{{{\lambda ^4}}} + \ldots \cr
& \Rightarrow \mu \propto \frac{1}{\lambda } \cr} $$
Hence, focal length $$f \propto \lambda $$
For a convex lens, $${f_R} > {f_V}\,\,{\text{or}}\,\,{f_V} < {f_R}.$$
For a concave lens, focal length is negative. So, focal length of concave lens for violet light $${F_V} > $$ Focal length of concave lens for red light $${F_R}.$$
198.
A thin prism having refracting angle $${10^ \circ }$$ is made of glass of refractive index 1.42. This prism is combined with another thin prism of glass of refractive index 1.7. This combination produces dispersion without deviation. The refracting angle of second prism should be
For dispersion without deviation, net deviation produced by the combination of prisms must be zero.
Let, prism angle of the first and second prisms are $${A_1}$$ and $${A_2}$$ respectively. Similarly, their refractive indices are $${\mu _1}$$ and $${\mu _2}.$$
Condition for dispersion without deviation is
$$\eqalign{
& {\delta _1} - {\delta _2} = 0 \cr
& \Rightarrow \left( {{\mu _1} - 1} \right){A_1} - \left( {{\mu _2} - 1} \right){A_2} = 0 \cr
& \Rightarrow {A_2} = \left( {\frac{{{\mu _1} - 1}}{{{\mu _2} - 1}}} \right) \cr
& {A_1} = \left( {\frac{{1.42 - 1}}{{1.7 - 1}}} \right)\left( {{{10}^ \circ }} \right) \cr
& \Rightarrow {A_2} = {6^ \circ } \cr} $$
199.
A ray of light is incident at $${50^ \circ }$$ on the middle of one of the two plane mirrors arranged at an angle of $${60^ \circ }$$ between them. The ray then touches the second mirror, get reflected back to the first mirror, making an angle of incidence of
Huygen gave a hypothesis for geometrical construction of the position of a common wavefront at any instant, during the propagation of waves in a medium. Huygen’s principle can be used to explain the phenomenon of reflection, refraction and diffraction of light. Origin of spectra is explained by quantum theory.